Gail Riplinger Has Many Misquotes, Errors & Lies
New Age Bible Versions
by Gail Riplinger
contains multiple errors, lies,
the majority of which are the gross misquoting
of other people. In particular, a large portion of the misquoting is of the Bible, B.F. Wescott and F.J.A. Hort.
Presented here is just a small example of those misquotations
We compared the following actual quotations, as they appear in the original books, to the quotations as presented in New Age Bible Versions.
Here are two links to Wescott and Hort books readable in PDF and TXT format:
A large portion of Riplinger's books and interviews have been found to contain gross errors, such as misquotations of the people she mentions in her material. Two of the individuals most misquoted by Riplinger are Bishop Brooke Foss Westcott and Fenton John Anthony Hort, 19th-century British scholars who worked on a Greek text of the New Testament which was used in the translation of the English Revised Version of 1881 and the American Standard Version of 1901.
In New Age Bible Versions,
Riplinger claims that God has struck some "new version" Bible editors with the loss of their voice; Westcott is one of the editors of whom Riplinger has made this claim:
Westcott's biographer cites that in 1858 "he was quite inaudible" and by 1870 "His voice reached few and was understood by still fewer."
Riplinger cites this as coming from the book Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. 1,
written by his son, Arthur Westcott. The first misquote is from a line that actually tells of Westcott as a young man, as remembered by a Sir Dalrymple, who recalls, in a letter, Westcott's early years at Harrow School and that he was "shy, reserved, sensitive, a laborious student." Here is the actual paragraph from where Riplinger took her misquoted words:
He [Westcott] took his turn of preaching in Chapel, but he dreaded and disliked the duty, and he was quite inaudible to many of the boys. We knew all the same that his were no common sermons. It has been truly said "the sentences were closely packed with meaning, and the meaning was not always easy." [Bold text added to show the words Riplinger took out of context.]
The second misquoted line was again taken from Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. 1.
In this case, a Dr. Butler gives another remembrance of Westcott in a letter to his son. Butler says:
You have kindly asked me to give you some impressions as to your father's work and influence at Harrow. [...] The years to which my words will refer are, speaking roughly, from 1860 to 1870. [...] At that time Mr. Westcott, not yet thirty-five years of age, held a very peculiar position at Harrow. He was little known in the School at large. He was not a Form Master. He had no "Large House" to administer. His voice was not yet a force in the chapel. It reached but few, and it was understood by still fewer. But even then he had at least two spheres of influence - his own pupils on the one hand, and the Masters on the other.
Riplinger not only cut the two quotes from two different places in the original source but she also quoted the source incorrectly, leaving out the words that make the context clear, and making up her own quotation. Westcott never permanently lost his voice; he was simply known to have a quiet voice when he preached.
Riplinger also accuses Westcott of being a "spiritualist," although there is no evidence of this in any of Westcott's or his son's books. In New Age Bible Versions,
The Greek Text used to translate the NIV, NASB and others was an edition drastically altered by a Spiritualist (one who seeks contact with the dead through seances), who believed he was in the "new age." 
Here Riplinger cites Life and Letters of Brooke Foss Westcott, Vol. 2,
by Arthur Westcott. There is nothing in the book implicating Westcott as a "spiritualist"; the page cited contains a letter written by the Bishop in 1898, concerning the uncertainty of changing times as a new century was about to begin and the Industrial Revolution was advancing more rapidly. In the letter, Westcott notes "the struggles of a new age." The "new age" Westcott is referring to was the "new era" of change. The term "New Age", as it is used today, was not yet heard of in 1898.
On page 676 of ''New Age Bible Versions'', at endnote 128, a bold and unfounded false accusation against B.F. Westcott is found. There Riplinger implies that B.F. Westcott and W.W. Westcott were the same person:
The articles on Hermetic doctrine in Blavatsky's Theosophical Dictionary "were contributed at the special request of H.P.B. [ Helena Blavatsky ] by Brother W.W. Westcott [ William Wynn Westcott ]."
Riplinger does not cite the page number in Blavatsky's book where this quotation can be verified. Riplinger continues (same page):
She [Blavatsky] mentions B.F. Westcott, the subject of this past chapter, several times in her other books.
Riplinger does not say what these "other books" by Blavatsky are and offers no references. Riplinger continues (same page):
B.F. Westcott's son points out that his father's signature was almost always read as W., not B., preceeding [sic] his last name. (See Life of Westcott, p. 450.)
Riplinger does not mention whether it is page 450 in Volume 1 or Volume 2 of Life and Letters of Westcott.
References to B.F. Westcott's handwriting are actually found on page 449-450 of Vol. 2. Nowhere on page 449-450, or elsewhere in the two volumes, does Arthur Westcott say his father's signature was almost always read as a W preceding his last name. On page 449, Arthur Westcott quotes from several letters written by his father's colleagues who remarked that Westcott's handwriting and signature were often illegible or not decipherable. One of the colleagues mentions that he had come up with fifty possible interpretations for Westcott's signature.
Riplinger continues (same reference note) to draw false parallels between B.F. Westcott and W.W. Westcott:
The similar identity of these two is not a matter of historical record. W.W. Westcott was the name given by the London Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn as its founder. [Bold text added for emphasis]
Riplinger does not tell her readers that the birth dates and death dates (the historical facts) of both of these men are entirely different. Anglican Bishop B.F. Westcott was born 1/12/1825 and died on 7/27/1901; William Wynn Westcott was born 12/17/1848 and died on 7/30/1925.
These two men were born 23 years apart and died nearly 24 years apart. William Wynn Westcott's name was not the name given to him when he became the founder of the London Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn; it was his name from birth. History shows there is no similarity between these two men, except they had the same last name. Despite this, Riplinger continues, in the same footnote, to draw parallels by writing of W.W. Westcott's occultic activity with the assumption that it somehow matches the life of B.F. Westcott:
Strangely W.W. Westcott's motto "Vincit omnia veritus" [sic] (Truth conquers all things) rings like B.F. Westcott's "they loved truth more" and Blavatsky's "There is no religion higher than truth." (Riplinger misspelled veritas.)
After stating more information about the life of W.W. Westcott and implying a parallel between him and B.F. Westcott, Riplinger says:
The connection between B.F. Westcott and the activities attributed to the possible allonym W.W. Westcott are speculation on my part. [Bold Text added for emphasis]
Despite the obvious difference in birth and death dates, Riplinger calls W.W. Westcott's name an "allonym" of B.F. Westcott.
As for accusations that B.F. Westcott was an "evolutionist," the name of "Darwin" is mentioned only two times in and Letters of Westcott,
(Vol. 1 only). On page 217, Westcott's son reports that in a letter his father wrote:
Every one is busy with controversy, and one gentleman announced that "the feelings of scorn and contempt were given us by Almighty God to wither such empty sciolists as" Darwin and all naturalists in mass...
B.F. Westcott was borrowing someone's quote about "empty sciolists" (sciolist: "superficial knowledge; one who knows little." http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/sciolist.) to express his opinion of "Darwin" and "all naturalists in a mass." The mention of "naturalists" appears to be a reference to Darwin's theory of "natural selection."
On page 335 of Life and Letters of Westcott,
Vol. 1, Bishop Westcott is replying in a letter to Mr. A. Macmillan (his publisher), thanking him for giving him some book reading suggestions:
My dear Mr. Macmillan - Very many thanks for the Bishop's sake, and many for myself. I shall be very glad to have "George Eliot." Romola is, I think, the greatest novel of the time. Darwin I have already. If you happen to come across Mill's letter, I shall be very glad to have it.
B.F. Westcott especially enjoyed reading the works of "George Eliot." The mere mention that Westcott already had something written by Darwin does not prove that Westcott was an "evolutionist," in the same way that owning a copy of the Koran does not make one a Muslim.
The words evolution, evolutionary, evolutionist,
do not exist in either volume of Life and Letters of B.F. Westcott
and there are no references in any of Westcott's personal books and writings that proclaim any such belief in Evolution.
An example of Riplinger misquoting sources and facts in order to slander "modern versions" of the Bible is found on page 41 of New Age Bible Verions:
Historically, Isaiah 14 has been used as the singular biography of Lucifer...The intervening verses expose his pride in the five "I wills," each a rung in his descent into hell. ("I will" is also the official motto of the U.S. city sporting zip code 60606. In 1966, this same city hatched the NIV.) (New Age Bible Versions, fourth printing, 1994.) [parentheses in the original]
The "U.S. city" with the zip code 60606 is Chicago, even though Chicago has more than one zip code, such as 60601, 60602, 60607, 60610, 60656, et al. The circular reasoning and conspiracy theory in Riplinger's quotation implies that because one of the zip codes of Chicago contains 3 sixes (666), this proves the NIV as evil since the number 666 in the Bible is related to the Antichrist.
Chicago has more than one motto, such as "Urbs in Horto," meaning "City in a Garden." In actuality, the Chicago motto "I will" does not hold the negative implication that Riplinger has assigned it in her book.
According to the preface of the NIV, the translation was first "conceived in 1965...", not in 1966, and it was sponsored by the New York Bible Society.  In the original 1978 preface of the NIV, it states the "group of scholars met at Palos Heights, Illinois..." not Chicago. It appears that Riplinger changed 1965 to 1966 to match the double sixes with the "666" connotation. This is an example of the false attachment utilized many times by Riplinger in her books.
Gail Riplinger's Misrepresentation of Modern Bible Translations
In the Berean Baptist Hour video, while displaying the front cover she ripped from an NIV Bible, Riplinger points out that the "new versions" are not "holy" because they change "holy angels" to say just "angels," "removing the word holy
." She said that by doing this the modern translations are "secularizing the Bible" and making it difficult to distinguish good angels from bad angels. However, Riplinger does not mention that out of the 94 times that the word angels
appears in the KJV, only four of those times list them as "holy angels." This means that the other 90 places in the KJV where angels are mentioned, they are not called "holy angels" but just "angels," the same as the modern Bible versions. Using Riplinger's argument, the KJV also makes it difficult to determine good angels from bad angels in those 90 places. The modern versions say "holy angels" in three out of the four places that the KJV does, meaning that in only one
instance the word holy
is left off the word angels
in the "new versions," and yet the context of the passage in the modern versions makes it clear as to what "kind" of angels are being mentioned. Unjustifiable accusations against the modern Bible translations such as these have caused some of Riplinger's critics to susupect that she is actually out to attack the word of God rather than to defend it.
"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free." John 8:32 KJV
Put on the whole armor of God as a defense against deception.
"Finally, my brethren, be strong in the Lord and in the power of His might. Put on the whole armor of God, that you may be able to stand against the wiles of the devil. For we do not wrestle against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this age, against spiritual hosts of wickedness in the heavenly places. Therefore take up the whole armor of God, that you may be able to withstand in the evil day, and having done all, to stand. Stand therefore, having girded your waist with truth, having put on the breastplate of righteousness, and having shod your feet with the preparation of the gospel of peace; above all, taking the shield of faith with which you will be able to quench all the fiery darts of the wicked one. And take the helmet of salvation, and the sword of the Spirit, which is the word of God; praying always with all prayer and supplication in the Spirit, being watchful to this end with all perseverance and supplication for all the saints. and for me, that utterance may be given to me, that I may open my mouth boldly to make known the mystery of the gospel, for which I am an ambassador in chains; that in it I may speak boldly, as I ought to speak." Ephesians 6:10-22 NKJV
"May you be blessed by the LORD the Maker of heaven and earth." Psalms 115:15 NIV
Please don't be deceived by G.A. Riplinger - Gail Riplinger.
Please freely use anything on this website.
Gail Riplinger Misquotes, Errors & Lies